Inductivist partially answered

Inductivit queried:

Phil Rushton and colleagues at the journal Personality and Individual Differences continue to push the the theory that genes explain the worldwide correlation between skin tone and important behaviors…

As Razib Khan has explained on this blog, pleiotropy as the explanation of these correlations simply does not work. So what plausible theories remain? Any ideas?

Citing some other research, I suggested that national IQ differences probably mediated the correlation between skin color and national K differences. This conjecture was partially borne out by Meisenberg and Woodley’s recent findings. Though, net of National IQ skin color is still a significant predictor of National K.

Meisenberg, G., & Woodley, M. A. Global behavioral variation: A test of differential-K. Personality and Individual Differences
(2012)
, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.016

However, meta-analysis does not support an association between g and K at the individual differences level (Woodley, 2011a). What then could account for this ‘‘Rushton paradox’’?

One possibility is that at the individual differences level, g genes assort independently with K genes, and became correlated at the inter population level because selective pressures favoring higher g also favored higher K. A second possibility is clinal variation. As Sub Saharan Africans exhibit low g relative to other populations, any trait that systematically differs between Africans and non-Africans would therefore become incidentally correlated with g at the population level. A third possibility is that because both K and g are, in part, dependent upon environmental conditions, poor environments favoring fast life history might also inhibit g (Figueredo, 2009). A fourth possibility is that at the level ofinternational comparisons,IQ tests lose their g-loadings, such that national differences become accentuated by the Flynn effect. This suggests that effort allocation into the development of specific abilities rather than differences in levels of g may partially account for the association between national intelligence measures and national K (Woodley, 2011b, in press)….

[...] The results show that K can be operationalized at the country level with variables that conform to current understanding of this construct. However, the relationship between country-level g and country-level K, and especially between country-level K and individual-level K, require further investigation. Evolutionary conditions appear to be plausible contributors to the current worldwide distributions of both traits.

(BTW, You can read Templer’s overly effusive summary of Rushton’s work on the general factor of personality and national K differences, here:
Templer, D. I. Rushton: The great theoretician and his contribution to personality. Personality and Individual Differences (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.038)

About these ads

2 thoughts on “Inductivist partially answered

  1. And there is this,

    http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

    In Fig. 3, the authors state that the black/eurasian split occurred 160,000 years ago, which means it would have occurred in Africa, not the Middle East or the Eurasian steppe.

    It also suggests that the evolutionary history of black/eurasian differences is very much deeper than is normally thought, anf that the time available for Rushton-type evolution is also very long.

comments do not require an email

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s